Jump to content

Talk:King Arthur's family

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Doesn't Wolfram give Arthur and Ginover a child name Ilinot?

[edit]

I don't know whether that would be a Son of a Daughter> --JaredMithrandir (talk) 04:45, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ilinot is a son.
He is based on the older, pre-Vulgate version of Sir Loholt, who was legitimate son of Arthur and Guinevere, rather than a bastard by some other woman. 49.144.200.243 (talk) 03:40, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on King Arthur's family. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:36, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

“Smerviemore”?

[edit]

I don't see anything in the article about this, but on FamilySearch.org, I found a profile of a claimed figure named “Smerviemore ab Arthur Pendragon”. I could not find anything online about this figure. Apparently a FamilySearch user “ArthurGray1” put “This is the son of Arthur Pendragon” as the name reason (11 December 2023) and it appears the profile was created 11 October 2023 or before. the profile claims that this person lived 490-555. Then a few months later they changed the name to Mordred Pendragon, a known son of Arthur Pendragon. Not sure about the initial name if it was someone else, or just an alias of Mordred Pendragon. The FamilySearch profile ID is GL59-QTW. Update: I checked the recent changes log and it appears the initial name was actually “Diarmait O Duibhne Lord Of Lochow” and their parents were listed as “Dond O Duibhne” and “Cocraind”. Newaccount33333 (talk) 19:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]